The WRA, as amended by Work Choices, created several classes of workplace agreements (see: Part 8 Div.2 WRA). They include:
- Australian Workplace Agreements (AWAs) (see note below);
- union collective agreements;
- employee collective agreements;
- multiple business agreements; and
- employer greenfields agreements.
The Transition to Forward with Fairness Act removed the ability to make and lodge new AWAs after 28 March 2008, but it created a new type of individual agreement, an Individual Transitional Employment Agreement (ITEA), which a specified class of employer can make and lodge until 31 December 2009. After 31 December 2009 no new statutory individual employment agreements will be made or lodged.
Agreements (both individual and collective) made under the WRA will continue to operate after the FW Act comes into force. The FWTPCA Act provides that the NES apply to all national system employees from 1 January 2010. Therefore, from 1 January 2010 the NES will provide additional minimum terms and conditions for employees on statutory agreements.
AWAs are individual agreements made between an employee and his or her employer. They are in effect a statutory form of contract, although they may only be created and enforced under the Act. An AWA excludes the operation of collective agreements and awards that may otherwise apply to the employee who is a party to the AWA (ss.348–349 WRA (pre-Transition to Forward with Fairness Act)).
The parties may specify a nominal expiry date in the AWA, provided that it is no later than the fifth anniversary of the date the agreement was lodged. If no date is specified in the AWA the nominal expiry date is five years from the date an AWA is lodged with the Office of the Workplace Authority (s.352 WRA (pre-Transition to Forward with Fairness Act)). (See: "How workplace agreements come into force", below.)
An AWA operates until it is terminated, replaced or declared void by a court. It may only be terminated in accordance with the WRA, which requires, at least, that the agreement exceed its nominal expiry date.
The Transition to Forward with Fairness Act removed the ability to make and lodge new AWAs after 28 March 2008. AWAs made and lodged before 28 March 2008 can remain in place until they are terminated. From 1 January 2010 employees employed on AWAs will have the additional protection of the NES.
The Transition to Forward with Fairness Act allows a defined class of employers to make an ITEA (s.326 WRA). These classes of employers include those who employed employees on AWAs as at 1 December 2007. ITEAs have a statutory nominal expiry date of 31 December 2009 but will remain in operation after that time until they are terminated under the WRA Act (ss.352 & 347 WRA).
Collective agreements under the WRA apply to groups of employees employed in a single business or part of a business. Before the Work Choices amendments, collective agreements were called certified agreements. Under the FW Act they are enterprise agreements. The WRA provided for several types of collective agreement, including employee collective agreements, union collective agreements and union greenfields agreements. From 1 July 2009 statutory agreements will be made under the FW Act (see: "Fair Work Act Agreements", below).
- Employee collective agreements are made between an employer and its employees about the terms and conditions of employment that will apply to some or all of that employer's employees (s.327 WRA).
- Union collective agreements are made between an employer and a trade union about the terms and conditions of employment that will apply to some or all of that employer's employees (s.328 WRA).
- Union greenfields agreements are made between an employer who proposes to establish a new business and a trade union, about the terms and conditions of employment that will apply to some or all of the future employees employed in the new business (s.329 WRA).
Under the WRA: It requires workplace agreements to be approved and, once approved, lodged with the Office of the Workplace Authority (OWA).
Under Work Choices: In all cases, an approved workplace agreement comes into legal effect once it is lodged with the OWA.
The parties may specify a nominal expiry date in the agreement, provided that it is no later than the fifth anniversary of the date the agreement was lodged. If no date is specified in the collective agreement the nominal expiry date is five years from the date it is lodged with the OWA. A collective agreement remains in force until it has passed its nominal expiry date and is terminated under the provisions of Division 9 of Part 8 of the WRA.
Under the WRA multiple business agreements (see: s.331 of the WRA) are made between employers operating a number of single businesses and the employees of those employers or their trade union(s) about the terms and conditions of employment that will apply in the businesses. In substance, it means that a type of collective agreement can be made that can apply to more than one employer who operate a number of single businesses.
Because multiple business agreements are collective agreements, the same rules concerning nominal expiry dates and the period such agreements operate apply. However, if an employer who is party to a multiple business agreement that is in force makes an agreement that applies to a single business covered by that multiple business agreement during its life, the multiple business agreement ceases to operate in relation to the single business.
Under the WRA employer greenfields agreements (see: s.330 of the WRA) are, despite their name, not really agreements at all. This species of "agreement", until now unknown to Australian labour law, entitles an employer who proposes to establish a new business to unilaterally set terms and conditions of employment that will apply to future employees of the proposed business.
The nominal expiry date of an employer greenfields agreement is one year from the date it is lodged with the OWA. However, the parties may specify a nominal expiry date in the agreement, provided that it is no later than the first anniversary of the date the agreement was lodged.
From 1 July 2009 statutory agreements will be made under the FW Act. They will be known as enterprise agreements. Under section 172 of the FW Act there are two types of statutory agreements:
- single enterprise agreements; and
- multi-enterprise agreements.
Single enterprise agreements can be made in two ways. Firstly, an agreement can be made between an employer or two or more employers that are single interest employers and employees. A trade union may or may not be covered by this type of agreement. Alternatively, a single enterprise agreement can be made for a genuine new enterprise, between an employer or two or more employers that are single interest employers and one or more trade unions.
Multi-enterprise agreements can also be made in two ways. Firstly, a multi-enterprise agreement can be made between two or more employers that are not single interest employers and employees. A trade union may or may not be covered by this type of agreement. Alternatively, a multi-enterprise agreement can be made for a genuine new enterprise between an employer or two or more employers that are single interest employers and one or more trade unions.
Under the Transition to Forward with Fairness Act ITEAs for new employees and greenfields agreements take effect when lodged with the OWA, whereas union collective agreements, employee collective agreements and ITEAs for existing employees will take effect when approved by the OWA (s.347(1) WRA).
Under the FW Act an agreement will come into operation seven days after the agreement is approved by Fair Work Australia (FWA) or a later day specified in the agreement (s.54 FW Act).
The Transition to Forward with Fairness Act abolishes the Fairness Test (discussed above under "Recent history of industrial regulation") and the concept of protected award conditions for agreements lodged on or after 28 March 2008. Instead, agreements made and lodged between 28 March 2008 and 30 June 2009 will be assessed by the OWA against a "No Disadvantage Test" (NDT) (see following).
In the case of a collective agreement the OWA must be satisfied that the agreement would not result, on balance, in a reduction in the overall terms and conditions of employment of employees under a "reference instrument" relating to one or more employees to be employed under the agreement (s.346 WRA). A reference instrument for a collective agreement can include a Federal Award, preserved State Awards (not relevant for Victoria) or a state law, such as a long service leave Act.
The NDT requires the assessment of all terms of the proposed agreement against the terms of the relevant reference instrument. If some terms of the agreement are less than the terms of the reference instrument then other terms of the agreement will need to provide superior terms to ensure that the employees are, on balance, not suffering a reduction in terms and conditions. The NDT applies to all conditions of the reference instrument, unlike the previous Fairness Test, which only applied to specified "protected conditions".
If the OWA decides that the agreement does not completely pass the NDT, it may still approve the agreement provided there are exceptional circumstances and it would not be contrary to the public interest (s.346D(3) WRA). Such a circumstance may be, for example, where there is a short-term financial crisis in a business, and the agreement is seeking to ensure the business continues in operation.
In the case of an ITEA the OWA must be satisfied that the agreement would not result, on balance, in a reduction in the overall terms and conditions of employment of employees under a "reference instrument" relating to one or more employees to be employed under the agreement (s.346 WRA). A reference instrument for an ITEA can include a Federal Award, a collective agreement that might otherwise apply to the employee, a preserved State Award (not relevant for Victoria) or a state law, such as a long service leave Act.
The NDT requires the assessment of all terms of the proposed agreement against the terms of the relevant reference instrument. If some terms of the agreement are less than the terms of the reference instrument then other terms of the agreement will need to provide superior terms to ensure that the employees are, on balance, not suffering a reduction in terms and conditions. The NDT applies to all conditions of the reference instrument unlike the previous Fairness Test, which only applied to specified "protected conditions".
The power to approve, in exceptional circumstances, an ITEA that otherwise fails the NDT is not available to the OWA as it is in the case of collective agreements (above).
From 1 July 2009 an enterprise agreement will need to pass the "Better Off Overall Test" ("BOOT") to be approved by FWA. Section 193 of the FW Act provides that a non-greenfield, enterprise agreement passes the BOOT if FWA is satisfied that each employee and prospective employee would be better off overall if the agreement applied to them than if the relevant modern award applied to them.
Section 189 of the FW Act provides that if an agreement fails the BOOT it may still be approved by FWA if it is satisfied that due to exceptional circumstances the approval would not be contrary to the public interest. An agreement approved on this basis can only have a nominal expiry date of a maximum of two years after approval.
For each type of enterprise agreement there different procedures for making an agreement (s.182 FW Act; see: "How workplace agreements come into force", above).
- For a single enterprise agreement (that is not a greenfields agreement): The agreement is made when the majority of employees cast a valid vote to approve the agreement.
- For a multi-enterprise agreement (that is not a greenfields agreement): The agreement is made when the majority of employees of at least one of the employers cast a vote for the approval of the agreement.
- For a greenfields agreement: The agreement is made when it is signed by the employer and each relevant trade union that is expressed to be covered by the agreement.
Under section 180 of the FW Act an employer must take reasonable steps prior to the agreement being voted on to ensure:
- that the employees have had access to the written agreement;
- that the employees are advised of how, when and where the vote will take place; and
- that the terms and effect of the agreement have been explained to the employees.
Enterprise agreements come into force only once they have been approved by FWA. Before approving an enterprise agreement, FWA must be satisfied of a number of matters, including:
- that the agreement passes the BOOT, or if it fails the BOOT should be otherwise approved (see: "Better Off Overall Test", above);
- that the agreement does not contravene section 55 of the FW Act, including that the agreement does not seek to exclude any provisions of the NES (s.186(2)(c) FW Act);
- that the agreement includes a nominal expiry date of not more than four years after FWA approves the agreement and a dispute resolution clause (s.186); and
- if the agreement is not a greenfields agreement, that the employees genuinely agreed to the agreement (s.186(2)(a)).
The content of an enterprise agreement is largely a matter for the parties. However, there is some content that the FW Act requires, permits and prohibits. Under section 55 of the FW Act an enterprise agreement cannot exclude the NES or any provision of the NES (see: "National Employment Standards", above). Part 2-2 of the FW Act allows enterprise agreements to deal with some matters in the NES.
An enterprise agreement under the FW Act should contain:
- A nominal expiry date. This is the date after which the agreement may be replaced by a new agreement. Under section 186(5) of the FW Act, the date may be specified in the agreement but must, other than for ITEAs and agreements failing the BOOT but approved on the basis of special circumstances, be no later than four years after the date on which the agreement was approved by FWA. If no date is specified in a collective agreement, then the nominal expiry date is four years from the date it is approved by the OWA. For ITEAs, the nominal expiry date is the earlier of a date specified in the agreement or 31 December 2009. For agreements failing the BOOT but approved on the basis of special circumstances, the nominal expiry date is the earlier of the date in the agreement or two years after the day on which FWA approved the agreement (s.189 FW Act).
- A dispute settlement procedure. A procedure that deals with disputes about any matters arising under the agreement, and in relation to the NES, must form part of an enterprise agreement (s.186(6)).
- Minimum entitlements. Although not required to be part of a workplace agreement, the NES provides minimum entitlements to employees and cannot be excluded by an enterprise agreement (s.55). The minimum entitlements of employees can be improved in an enterprise agreement.
- A flexibility term. Under section 202 of the FW Act an enterprise agreement must contain a flexibility term that allows an employee and an employer to agree that terms of the enterprise agreement have effect in relation to the employee and the employer as if the agreement were varied by that arrangement. The flexibility term must require the employer to ensure that the employee is better off overall under the proposed flexibility arrangement. If the enterprise agreement does not contain a flexibility term, then the model flexibility term prescribed by the regulations will be taken as a term of the enterprise agreement.
- A consultation term. An enterprise agreement must contain a consultation term which requires an employer to consult with employees about major workplace change that is likely to have a significant effect on employees (s.205). If the enterprise agreement does not contain a consultation term, then the model consultation term prescribed by the regulations will be taken as a term of the enterprise agreement.
The content of a workplace agreement is substantially in the hands of the parties. For matters to be included in an enterprise agreement under the FW Act they must fall within one of the following categories:
- matters relating to the relationship between the employer/s and the employees;
- matters relating to the relationship between the employer/s and the relevant union/s;
- deductions from wages authorised by the employee; and
- how agreements will operate.
See: section 172(1) of the FW Act.
An enterprise agreement under the FW Act must not contain a term that is an unlawful term (s.186(4) FW Act). Unlawful terms are defined in section 194 of the FW Act to include:
- discriminatory terms, being terms that discriminate on the basis of the employee's race, colour, sex, sexual preference, age, physical or mental disability, martial status, family or carer's responsibilities, pregnancy, religion, political opinion, national extraction or social origin;
- objectionable terms, being terms that would require or permit conduct in breach of the "General Protections" contained in the FW Act, discussed below under "General Protections";
- a term that would confer additional rights on an employee to claim unfair dismissal within the minimum employment period (for a definition see: "Unfair dismissal", below) or would exclude or detrimentally modify an employee's unfair dismissal rights;
- a term inconsistent with employees' or employers' rights in relation to industrial action; or
- a term that modifies union officials' rights of entry into workplaces.
AWAs commence operation when lodged with the OWA. While an AWA is in force, any other agreement or award that does or could apply to an employee party to the AWA has no effect.
The nominal expiry date of an AWA is the earlier of the nominal expiry date specified in the agreement or five years from the date an AWA is lodged with the OWA. An AWA operates until it is terminated, replaced or declared void by a court. It may only be terminated in accordance with the WRA, which requires, at least, that the agreement exceed its nominal expiry date.
A party who breaches an AWA may be liable in damages to the innocent party for the breach and may be ordered to pay a civil penalty up to $6,600, in the case of an individual, and $33,000 for a body corporate.
ITEAs for new employees commence operation when lodged with the OWA (s.347(1) WRA). ITEAs for existing employees commence operation when approved by the OWA.
The nominal expiry date of ITEAs is the earlier of the nominal expiry date specified in the agreement or 31 December 2009, but ITEAs will continue to operate until terminated or replaced (ss.352 & 347 WRA).
Under Work Choices: In all cases, an approved workplace agreement comes into legal effect once it is lodged with the OWA.
Under the Transition to Forward with Fairness Act: ITEAs for new employees and greenfields agreements take effect when lodged with the OWA, whereas union collective agreements, employee collective agreements and ITEAs for existing employees will take effect when approved by the OWA (s.347(1) WRA).
The nominal expiry date of a Work Choices collective agreement is the earlier of the nominal expiry date specified in the agreement or five years from the date it is lodged with the OWA. A collective agreement remains in force until it has passed its nominal expiry date and is replaced by another collective agreement (s.347(5) WRA as amended by Work Choices).
A party who breaches a collective agreement may be liable to pay a civil penalty and be ordered to pay any unpaid wages or other amount the court finds was required to be paid by the relevant term of the agreement.
Under the FW Act: Under section 186(5) of the FW Act, the nominal expiry date may be specified in the agreement but must, other than for ITEAs and agreements failing the BOOT but approved on the basis of special circumstances, be no later than four years after the date on which the agreement was approved by the FWA. If no date is specified in a collective agreement, then the nominal expiry date is four years from the date it was approved by FWA.
An enterprise agreement will come into operation seven days after it is approved by the FWA or a later day specified in the agreement (s.54 FW Act). Enterprise agreements will continue to operate after their nominal expiry date until they are terminated or replaced.
It is unlawful to engage or threaten to engage in any action with the intention of coercing a person to, or not to, make a collective agreement, or to approve or vary or terminate such an agreement. However, since 1993 the law has permitted and accepted that coercion in the form of industrial action may occur when agreements are being negotiated. To that end, industrial action by employers, employees and unions can be permitted and protected by the WRA if it is applied towards the making and supporting of claims for a new agreement. Therefore, it is not unlawful to engage in protected industrial action. However, industrial action will only be protected if the procedures for protected industrial action in the WRA are complied with (see: Part 9 of the WRA). (Also see: "Industrial action", below.)
An extensive discussion of the law of industrial action is beyond the scope of this chapter. Since 1993 there has been a right to engage in protected industrial action for the purposes of advancing and supporting claims in connection with a prospective workplace agreement.
Industrial action is a broad and defined term covering a range of activities engaged in by the parties to an industrial dispute. Most frequently, it is used to describe the activities of employees and their unions, and involves action taken to disrupt work. The action may take the form of strikes, a refusal to work as directed by the employer, or the imposition of a ban on certain activities, or some other limitation or restriction on work performed. On the employer side, industrial action usually takes the form of what is known as a lockout, which is action that prevents (or locks out) the employees from performing their work and receiving their usual remuneration.
Industrial action is dealt with by Chapter 3, Part 3-3 of the FW Act. The FW Act prescribes requirements for industrial action to be protected industrial action. Those requirements include the holding of a protected action ballot to determine whether employees wish to engage in particular protected industrial action for the proposed workplace agreement. No action lies against a party taking protected industrial action unless the action involves personal injury or wilful and reckless damage to property (s.415).
Industrial action that does not meet the requirements of Part 3-3 of the FW Act is not protected and is unlawful. In those circumstances, the FWA has the power to order that industrial action ceases (s.418). Also, those who participate in such action may be subject to civil liability, including damages and injunction.
Only industrial action that meets the definition in the FW Act is capable of being protected. Picketing has been held by the courts not to be industrial action. Accordingly, it cannot be protected. That said, peaceful protest outside an employer's property (which is often described as picketing) is in law just that, peaceful protest, and hence not unlawful.
WORKPLACE AGREEMENTS :: Last updated: Wed Jul 1st 2009


Prev
Next
Printable Version