The AC Act lays down the specific circumstances under which parties may be reimbursed from the Board. The most common of these are in the following areas:
- adjournment of a criminal proceeding;
- discontinuance of a criminal proceeding;
- a successful criminal appeal;
- an appeal by the DPP or Crown;
- a successful civil appeal; and
- discontinuance of a civil proceeding.
Note: There are particular conditions and limitations within each area. These are specified on the Appeal Costs Board's website at www.justice.vic.gov.au (follow the links from "Business Areas").
Note that the AC Act does not allow reimbursement of costs for adjournment of a civil proceeding.
In criminal matters, most applications arise under section 17(1) of the AC Act. Suppose, for example, you have been charged with a criminal offence. You consult a solicitor and pay for a barrister to represent you at the hearing of your case. On the day of the hearing, however, you arrive at court with your barrister only to learn that the court is unable to hear the matter due to a court issue. Were it not for the AC Act, you would have to meet the costs of your legal representation for both the adjourned hearing date and the new hearing. In these circumstances, section 17(1) provides that you may be reimbursed for the costs of your representation at the adjourned hearing.
However, in some criminal adjournments, the court may order costs against any party or any person rather than issue an indemnity certificate. This issue would be considered by the court on the day of the adjournment.
Note: Section 17(5) has been amended under the Appeal Costs and Penalty Interest Rates Act (Amendment) Act 2004 (Vic) to allow the Attorney-General to specify the maximum amount payable by the Board (see links from the Board's website).
Under section 35A, a corporation having a paid up share capital of $200,000 or more, or a subsidiary of such a corporation, cannot receive any payment from the Board except under sections 6, 9 or 13 of the AC Act.
In addition, an appellant may be reimbursed for the costs of an appeal at which:
- a conviction upon indictment is quashed (s.14(1));
- a conviction upon indictment is upheld and a new trial is ordered (s.14(2)); or
- an appeal is instituted by the Crown or the DPP under section 567A of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) or section 84 of the Magistrates' Court Act 1989 (Vic).
Note: The AC Act does not allow a certificate to be granted to a respondent for its own costs if the Crown appeals on a question of law judicial review to the Supreme Court from a decision of a magistrate.
In civil matters, most applications arise under section 4(1) of the AC Act, which allows an unsuccessful respondent to an appeal on a question of law to claim reimbursement from the Board for both the respondent's and the appellant's costs in relation to the appeal. The maximum amount payable under a section 4 claim is $50,000.
Where a part-heard case is discontinued and a new trial is ordered, reimbursement may be made in both civil proceedings (s.10) and criminal proceedings (s.16). This may occur for other reasons not attributable in any way to the fault of the parties; for example, where inadmissible evidence has prejudiced the jury hearing of a case or where a witness is found to be known by the judge or magistrate, or by a member of the jury. The certificate must be issued by the court before the matter can be determined by the Board.
Note that eligibility under the AC Act does not arise until after the costs of the next scheduled hearing or new trial have been incurred. No reimbursements are made if proceedings are withdrawn or cases settled before the next hearing. The Act requires the Board to consider the additional costs incurred as a result of the granting of the certificate.
Section 35D specifies that an application to the Board must be lodged with the Board no later than 12 months after the final hearing of the matter to which the indemnity certificate relates.
ELIGIBILITY :: Last updated: Thu Jul 1st 2010

Prev
Next
Printable Version